The Vermont Agency of Natural Resources
Forests and Forest Lands


Forests have a profound effect on the culture and economy of Vermont. This vast resource, covering nearly 80% of the state, provides stability to the landscape, clear water to our mountain streams, wildlife habitat, and diverse recreational opportunities. These forests also contribute to a "sense of place" which defines how we feet about the area in which we live, work and play. Scenic vistas of red, yellow and orange foliage provide lasting images for residents and Visitors. The trees also provide jobs to Vermonters from, tourism and in the wood products industry.

The health and availability of the forest resource is of continuing concern to Vermonters. To sustain our forest resources for future generations, we must continually monitor the forest condition and foster a stewardship ethic among the people of Vermont.

SUSTAINABILITY

Vermont's forests are always changing. Tax policy, human decisions and activities, ecological cycles and other naturally occurring events all influence this change. The challenge to Vermont and its citizens is to ensure that these changes continue to allow future generations of Vermonters to enjoy the many benefits provided by Vermont's forests.

The state’s forest lands are owned mostly by private individuals (Fig. 1). The various activities and decisions of private landowners are critical to the sustainability of Vermont's forests. Stewardship of these private lands is a prerequisite to assuring forest resource sustainability.

Over the last twenty years there has been a significant increase in the amount of forest land under management. Much of this rise stems from a growing number of private owners responding to such programs as the Current use Tax and Stewardship programs that encourage development and implementation of management plans. Since 1980 and 1990 respectively, these two programs have successfully promoted forest stewardship activities on over 900,000 acres of Vermont forest lands.

The Vermont Forest Stewardship Program, for example, encourages private landowners to examine their land ownership goals, guests activities to improve the forest and land resource, and helps to financially support these activities. Among the most common reasons for a landowner to embark upon forest management activities through this program are to enhance wildlife habitat, to increase recreation opportunities and experiences, and to improve timber harvesting yields.

Public land, including state-owned and federal lands, provides examples of good stewardship and can provide benefits unavailable through other ownerships. For example, the Mt. Mansfield State Forest, a 37,000 acre block in central Vermont, provides land for two major ski areas, three campgrounds and a day use area, protected habitat for peregrine falcons and many rare plants, many miles of cross country and snowmobile trails, a large segment of the Long Trail, a research site for intensive monitoring of forest health, and a continuous supply of wood products.

As part of its continuing effort to sustain Vermont’s forests, the Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation is moving toward a new approach to managing forest land called ecosystem management. This approach steps back from the individual tree or forest stand to focus upon the forest landscape. Ecosystem management gives more explicit consideration to the impacts of land use and forest management activities upon ecological functions. The Department is currently developing new strategies to out these concepts.

FOREST HEALTH

A wide variety of "stressors" which fluctuate greatly from year to year affect tree health. These include extreme weather, poor air quality, wildfire, and forest insect and disease epidemics. A number of imported pests are for some of the state’s most catastrophic forest health problems such as chestnut blight, Dutch elm disease, and beech bark disease. Earl y detection of stress problems as well as early prevention efforts help maintain the health of Vermont’s forests.

Monitoring changes in forest health allows forest managers to take actions to prevent or control potential threats to forest health. The Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation annually examines and measures trees and other vegetation on more than 145 permanent long-term study plots. Changes in forest insect populations and disease incidence are measured at more than zoo additional forest pest monitoring sites. The Department also conducts statewide surveys annually to detect damages to forests.

Sugar maples, as the dominant tree species in the state, can be used as a key indicator of forest health in Vermont. Since 1988, when tree health monitoring began, the percentage of sugar maples considered healthy (i.e. exhibiting low dieback) has improved and remained stable (Fig. 2). This improvement stems from a decrease in stress agents and more favorable growing conditions. Many sugar maple pests are currently at low population levels. This is true for the majority of other tree species as well (Fig- 3). As a result, most of Vermont's forests are in good condition.

Despite the low activity level of most major forest pests, some stresses continue to cause concern in 1994. A recent survey confirmed that Butternut canker is present in all Vermont counties. Birch defoliation was heavy for the fourth consecutive year, with most of the damage found on white birch trees. Several tree species, particularly red maple and balsam fir, produced very heavy seed crops in 1994, using trees’ energies at the expense of leaf production. Ozone damage to leaves of sensitive species (e.g. black cherry and white ash) was observed throughout the state. The Department will continue to monitor these stressors and assess their impacts on tree and forest health.


FOREST PRODUCTIVITY

The productivity of Vermont’s forests continues to be strong. The latest Vermont forest inventory (1983) shows that timber is growing at a rate of nearly 3% annually and there is a total resource of 6.3 billion cubic feet. The total forest harvest for 1993 was 111.7 million cubic feet. This is an increase of 7% over the 1992 harvest but still less than 2/3 of the total annual growth.

Harvest rates vary for individual species. The three most common species, by volume and number of trees, are sugar maple,. red maple, and spruce, The three most commonly harvested trees by volume in i993 were white pine, spruce, and sugar maple.

CHALLENGES



Return to the SEGIP Home Page